TL;DR: Portraits of the Apocalypse is an Argentine zombie anthology that cares more about people falling apart than zombies tearing people apart - it is a smart, strange little horror movie with some great ideas, although a couple of segments work better than others.
A Zombie Movie That Actually Has Something To Say
I have watched more than enough zombie movies where the main idea seems to be, how many different ways can someone smash a zombie’s head, so at some point, you start feeling like the undead deserve a break because they have probably seen the same movie more times than we have.
Portraits of the Apocalypse takes a different approach though, as yes, it is still a zombie movie - there are still infected people, blood, and plenty of bad decisions - but the focus is much more on the people stuck in the middle of everything going wrong, focusing more on the way people behave when the rules disappear.
Some people panic, some people pretend everything is fine, and some people make absolutely terrible choices while convincing themselves they are doing the right thing - basically, humanity takes one look at a disaster and immediately finds a way to make it worse.
The movie is split into four different stories, each looking at a different moment during the outbreak, and the style changes slightly between sections, but the whole thing still feels like one movie rather than four random shorts thrown together, which can be a problem with anthology films, but thankfully, Portraits of the Apocalypse mostly avoids that problem.
Finding Horror In Human Behavior
As said, Portraits of the Apocalypse does not treat zombies as the only scary thing happening here, as while the infected are dangerous, obviously, the movie is much more interested in the mistakes people make when they are scared.
The first segment does a good job mixing horror and dark comedy, where the main character is dealing with a situation that keeps getting worse, but instead of calmly accepting what is happening, she is more focused on protecting herself and trying to fix her own problems, so even during the end of the world, people would probably still be worried about their jobs, their reputation, and whether they can somehow avoid getting blamed for something.
Humanity has survived thousands of years, but apparently we still cannot stop making terrible decisions under pressure, and the humor works quite well too, because the film does not turn everything into a joke, as there is still a sense that things are getting out of control, and the comedy comes from the characters being completely unprepared for what is happening.
The second story continues that idea, focusing on a family dealing with problems inside their own home while something much bigger is happening outside, and it starts in a more familiar horror setup, but it slowly builds into something more uncomfortable, and I enjoyed the way the movie played with ordinary situations, just every day normal things until suddenly these things are happening during a zombie outbreak.
Read some more horror movie content:
The More Emotional Side Of The Apocalypse
The third story is where the movie slows down and becomes much more serious, and this was probably the section that worked best for me because it spends more time looking at what survival actually means, where it looks at isolation, fear, and the emotional damage caused by living through something impossible.
The video diary style also gives the story a more personal feeling, because it feels like someone trying to leave behind proof that they existed, and there is a bit of sadness running through this section because the characters are trying to hold onto hope while knowing things may never return to normal.
I also liked that the movie allowed some people to be, and feel, complicated, as nobody here feels like a perfect survivor who always makes the correct choice - they are scared, tired, selfish sometimes, and confused - basically, they act like actual people instead of movie characters who somehow have unlimited energy during the end of civilization.
The final chapter though is the one that takes the biggest risk and goes in a completely different direction, and it deals with grief and the need for closure, asking what someone might do if they had one last chance to connect with someone they lost.
This part is probably the most unusual section of the film, where it was certainly willing to mess around with the usual zombie rules, and after so many years of the same outbreak stories, it is nice seeing a movie actually try something different instead of just changing the location and pretending it invented a new idea.
A Smaller Zombie Movie With Bigger Ideas
Visually, Portraits of the Apocalypse keeps things simple, because it does not rely on huge action scenes or endless waves of zombies, and most of the movie takes place in smaller locations, which helps keep the attention on the characters, and the limited use of gore also works in its favor, as when a lot of horror movies throw blood everywhere, eventually you stop reacting to it, so here, the violent moments have more impact because the film is not constantly trying to shock you every five minutes.
The performances are another strong point, and the cast understands the tone of the movie, especially when it moves between uncomfortable humor and darker emotional moments, where the actors sell the idea that these are regular people trying to deal with something completely impossible, which is hard to pull off I would say.
Final Thoughts
Portraits of the Apocalypse is a welcome change from the usual zombie formula - it is funny, strange, and surprisingly thoughtful, with more interest in human mistakes than zombie kills, and while some stories land better than others, the overall movie works pretty well because it remembers the best zombie films are really about people.
A smart little horror anthology that proves the dead are not always the biggest problem - Portraits of the Apocalypse was released in 2024 at festivals, but released in 2026 on digital.